

The issue of liquidation of representation for a long time was illegally on the agenda of the system. From this point of view, after a certain time the system would want to get rid of this institution. That is, the institute of representation contradicted the prohibition and justice system existing in Azerbaijan. Only the representation was the only independent area where it was impossible to implement any measures. As is known, the dependence of judges and prosecutors was ensured, and the mechanism of removal of disobedient lawyers works. The main quality of the institution of representation was that it was the only unregulated institution within the judicial system (justice). How do you think, who interferes with the activities of the institute representatives? Who can prevent the restoration of the activities of this institution? To whom and why does not want its recovery? That is, do your job better and increase the number of lawyers. For this reason, this comment I am commenting more as a message to the new leadership of the College. Particularly difficult is the situation in the regions. Because during 2018, although there was an increase in the number of lawyers, however, the authorities are not satisfied with its pace. The current recognition of the small number of lawyers is in the form of recognition of the problem. Usually, when the authorities go to certain changes, they declare it loudly. Not any serious factor that can change the position. However, despite the confirmation, I am skeptical about the restoration of the institute of representatives, since the experience of October-November 2017 shows that the position on this issue is final. Currently, the situation has reached the point that the existence of problems in this area is confirmed. Despite this, official and official authorities denied the existence of the problem during that period and beyond. Especially outside the center of Baku and in the regions. By the number of lawyers, Azerbaijan is in last place in Europe. It was clear that such problems would appear, since the number of lawyers in Azerbaijan is very low. The fact that the abolition of the institute of representation will create negative consequences for us, NGO activists, warned in October-November 2017. Do you think the government can resume the activity of the institute of representation? The consequences of the abolition of the institution of representation today are voiced by officials. In connection with the events, the lawyer Samad Rahimli answers the questions of ASTNA. The day before the commencement of disciplinary proceedings against Shahla Humbatova, she reported that from January 2019 she began to obstruct her while visiting penal institutions. The reason - the complaint of the Prison Service in connection with the case of the blogger Mehman Huseynov. In recent days, the Bar Association has also begun disciplinary action against the lawyer Shahla Humbatova.

For the punishment of F.Namazly, the head of the Prison Service, General Jeyhun Hasanov, appealed to the Bar Association. In relation to him, the Bar Association proceeded to disciplinary execution. For example, in early May, the topic of discussion was the question of punishing lawyer Fariz Namazly, defending the interests of social and political activists. There is an opinion that the Bar Association punishes independent lawyers.

By the way, in the last period, the removal of lawyers from membership in the College was on the agenda. According to the information we have, there are areas where there is only one lawyer." The end of the quote.After this statement of Gunduz Karimov, most people think that the government could take measures to restore the institution of representation. "However, restrictions in the legislation, especially regarding the institution of representation, created obstacles for applying to the courts for persons of certain categories, especially outside Baku. " He noted a need to simplify issues and rules for admission to lawyers. Assistant to the First Vice-President of Azerbaijan, Gunduz Karimov, said at a conference on the topic "A lawyer's view of judicial and legal reforms" that the number of lawyers in the country is not large.
